It ’s behind some of the best screen background browser app , and all of thegreat peregrine ones . But just because a company says they ’re using WebKit , the open source web site rendering engine , does n’t insure an awesome web browser .
https://gizmodo.com/every-mobile-web browser-should-give-up-and-just-go-webkit-5271098
Peter - Paul Koch atQuirksmodedevised a bombardment of rendering tests to see how dissimilar WebKit browsers quantify up , and ran everything from desktop Safari 4 to the Pre ’s web browser app to S60V5 through a caesium and Javascript compatibility course . manifestly , some WebKit web browser app are hardly WebKit browsers at all — especially on Mobile River . Some surprises ? Android browser app are n’t so hot , nor is the Pre ’s . And Nokia , which has had WebKit web browser forever , ca n’t seem to make a in effect one .
There are really two culprit here : older variation of WebKit , which lame browsers like S60v3 ’s ; and developers ’ need to skin their software down to make it run swimmingly on mobile devices . In other words , some of these browsers have been stripped of HTML , CSS and Javascript rendering capabilities on purpose .
What ’d be really interesting is if the above chart mull upper and performance measurements too , because as ( obviously ) bad as the Android G1 ’s web browser is at return dark CSS component , actually using it is a far tidy sum more enjoyable than struggling with the unconscionably slow Iris on Windows Mobile . Full methodological analysis and test list at [ QuirksmodeviaIntoMobile ]
SafariWebKit
Daily Newsletter
Get the good tech , science , and polish news show in your inbox daily .
tidings from the future , delivered to your nowadays .
You May Also Like
