A group of several dozen scientists from multiple fields have bring on a theme call for activity to deoxidize exposure to a mint of mutual chemicals that they say set American children “ at an unacceptably high risk of developing neurodevelopmental disorderliness . ” The author have condemned the current system of evaluating chemical substance and making public health determination in the US as “ basically humbled , ” suggest that allowing the general universe to become let on to sure message may lead to conditions such asautismand other cerebral disabilities .
come out in the journalEnvironmental Health Perspectives , the report list several chemicals chance in common household merchandise , as well as others that are used in agribusiness , which it distinguish as among the most neurotoxic . Among these arephthalates , which are on a regular basis present in pharmaceutical and plastics , yet which have been shown to impede the sound functioning of the thyroid gland endocrine – a vital hormone that plays a primal part in brain developing .
Several type of agricultural fertilizers , as well as lead and mercury , are also name as among the most harmful chemical substance to the brains of infants . Worryingly , the author report that many of these substance have been used so extensively that they are now about unavoidable in our contaminated surround .

In astatement , co - source Susan Schantz explained that “ these chemicals are permeative , not only in aura and water , but in routine consumer products that we utilize on our bodies and in our home . ” It is therefore perhaps unsurprising that a 2011studyby the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ( CDC ) ascertain that 90 percent of pregnant women in the US had detectable tier of 62 harmful chemicals in their bodies .
Among these substance were the likes of polybrominated diphenyl ethers ( PBDEs ) and polychlorinated biphenyls ( PCBs ) , which can cross the placenta and affect theneurological developmentof foetus .
While this certainly paints a grim picture , Schantz importune that all promise is not lost , lay claim that “ reduce exposures to toxic chemicals can be done , and is desperately needed to protect today ’s and tomorrow ’s children . ”

Image : Many common chemicals may harm the neurologic development of fetuses and infants . Julie McMahon
However , for this to occur , the study authors assert that current practice must be scrapped , and that “ we must adopt a Modern framework for value chemical that have the electric potential to interrupt brain development and forbid the use of those that may dumbfound a risk of infection . "
For example , theycriticizethe way in which , under the current scheme , “ when a toxic chemical substance or category of chemicals is finally transfer from the marketplace , chemical manufacturers often fill in similar chemical that may pose similar concerns or be nearly untested for toxicity . ” By elbow room of exemplar , they summon when the federal government cast out dangerous organophosphate pesticide , manufacturers responded by flourish the use of neonicotinoid and pyrethroid pesticides , both of which have been show toharm the developing brain .
Perhaps most shockingly of all , the investigator point out that “ the vast bulk of chemicals in industrial and consumer product undergo almost no testing for developmental neurotoxicity or other wellness effects , ” and they are urgently hoping for a drastic modification of insurance .
Pregnant cleaning lady often have noticeable levels of many serious chemical in their bodies . Coffeemill / Shutterstock